<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lead Volume vs Opportunity Volume</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketing-results.com.au/blog/2008/12/15/lead-volume-vs-opportunity-volume/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketing-results.com.au/blog/2008/12/15/lead-volume-vs-opportunity-volume/</link>
	<description>Will Swayne blogs about online sales lead generation for product and service businesses and enjoying life while growing your company.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:37:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Voip Phones</title>
		<link>http://www.marketing-results.com.au/blog/2008/12/15/lead-volume-vs-opportunity-volume/comment-page-1/#comment-349594</link>
		<dc:creator>Voip Phones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketing-results.com.au/blog/?p=249#comment-349594</guid>
		<description>While marketing and sales are distinctly different disciplines, they are highly interdependent, and companies suffer when the two functions are not properly aligned or don&#039;t work together effectively.

Generating sales leads is almost always a marketing team&#039;s top mandate. Sales teams rely on marketing to find their leads, and marketing depends on sales to follow up on those leads and effectively develop opportunities. Yet points of contention abound, most often concerning lead quantity, quality, distribution, and timely follow-up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While marketing and sales are distinctly different disciplines, they are highly interdependent, and companies suffer when the two functions are not properly aligned or don&#8217;t work together effectively.</p>
<p>Generating sales leads is almost always a marketing team&#8217;s top mandate. Sales teams rely on marketing to find their leads, and marketing depends on sales to follow up on those leads and effectively develop opportunities. Yet points of contention abound, most often concerning lead quantity, quality, distribution, and timely follow-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enr</title>
		<link>http://www.marketing-results.com.au/blog/2008/12/15/lead-volume-vs-opportunity-volume/comment-page-1/#comment-331914</link>
		<dc:creator>enr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 14:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketing-results.com.au/blog/?p=249#comment-331914</guid>
		<description>Why can&#039;t leads and optys be combined so that sales force have one place to go to begin communication with a potential customer? Converting lead to opty is subjective so why can&#039;t the first stage of the opty be &quot;Lead&quot; and then use this as the filter for expected revenue. The only argument is the cluttering the opty records and the contact records. I think it depends on each company and their sfa lifecycle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t leads and optys be combined so that sales force have one place to go to begin communication with a potential customer? Converting lead to opty is subjective so why can&#8217;t the first stage of the opty be &#8220;Lead&#8221; and then use this as the filter for expected revenue. The only argument is the cluttering the opty records and the contact records. I think it depends on each company and their sfa lifecycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.marketing-results.com.au/blog/2008/12/15/lead-volume-vs-opportunity-volume/comment-page-1/#comment-282161</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketing-results.com.au/blog/?p=249#comment-282161</guid>
		<description>Yep the filter analogy works for me too - whatever you find easiest and, as you say, produces results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep the filter analogy works for me too &#8211; whatever you find easiest and, as you say, produces results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amway Scams Support</title>
		<link>http://www.marketing-results.com.au/blog/2008/12/15/lead-volume-vs-opportunity-volume/comment-page-1/#comment-282006</link>
		<dc:creator>Amway Scams Support</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketing-results.com.au/blog/?p=249#comment-282006</guid>
		<description>Instead of a funnel I think of it as a qualifying filter, and each step has a finer grade filter to finish with a pure result.
Anyway, statistics and metrics are important and interesting, but dont get paralysis by analysis guys. It&#039;s what you do with the leads that matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of a funnel I think of it as a qualifying filter, and each step has a finer grade filter to finish with a pure result.<br />
Anyway, statistics and metrics are important and interesting, but dont get paralysis by analysis guys. It&#8217;s what you do with the leads that matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.marketing-results.com.au/blog/2008/12/15/lead-volume-vs-opportunity-volume/comment-page-1/#comment-280816</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketing-results.com.au/blog/?p=249#comment-280816</guid>
		<description>@Selbourne Designing -- Motion Charts within Google Analytics are pretty cool [link here: http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=UKsBTqqhVTs], but like any analytical tool, it&#039;s a case of Garbage-In-Garbage-Out.  You need to first know your outcome before you can use a tool like this to achieve it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Selbourne Designing &#8212; Motion Charts within Google Analytics are pretty cool [link here: <a href="http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=UKsBTqqhVTs" >http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=UKsBTqqhVTs</a>, but like any analytical tool, it&#8217;s a case of Garbage-In-Garbage-Out.  You need to first know your outcome before you can use a tool like this to achieve it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Selbourne Designing</title>
		<link>http://www.marketing-results.com.au/blog/2008/12/15/lead-volume-vs-opportunity-volume/comment-page-1/#comment-280684</link>
		<dc:creator>Selbourne Designing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketing-results.com.au/blog/?p=249#comment-280684</guid>
		<description>Google analytics has a good tool to measure these. Has anyone tried out Motion charts? I am still learning it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google analytics has a good tool to measure these. Has anyone tried out Motion charts? I am still learning it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.marketing-results.com.au/blog/2008/12/15/lead-volume-vs-opportunity-volume/comment-page-1/#comment-276405</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketing-results.com.au/blog/?p=249#comment-276405</guid>
		<description>I think the optimal approach is to combine the best in quantitative and qualitative methods to generate the desired sales results.  i.e. strong focus on metrics backed by sound selling methods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the optimal approach is to combine the best in quantitative and qualitative methods to generate the desired sales results.  i.e. strong focus on metrics backed by sound selling methods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vicky</title>
		<link>http://www.marketing-results.com.au/blog/2008/12/15/lead-volume-vs-opportunity-volume/comment-page-1/#comment-276308</link>
		<dc:creator>vicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketing-results.com.au/blog/?p=249#comment-276308</guid>
		<description>finally someone else who sees sales in terms of statistics - lead rates and such. phew, seems obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>finally someone else who sees sales in terms of statistics &#8211; lead rates and such. phew, seems obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
